Software Engineer, LLM Performance & Evaluation
About this role
About FuriosaAI
FuriosaAI builds high-performance, high-efficiency AI compute for the Inference Era. Founded in 2017 by veteran semiconductor and AI algorithm engineers, Furiosa operates globally with offices in Korea and Silicon Valley, along with a compiler-focused R&D lab in Lisbon.
Our vision is to make AI computing sustainable, enabling access to powerful AI for everyone on Earth. We solve the AI hardware energy and operational cost crisis at the architectural level, rather than through brute force, building the world's first truly AI-native compute platform to unlock the full potential of artificial intelligence for every enterprise.
Software Engineer, LLM Performance & Evaluation
Location: Seoul, South Korea (Hybrid)
About the Job
FuriosaAI is seeking a Software Engineer to own the measurement and continuous tracking of LLM inference performance and model accuracy on our NPUs. You will build the benchmarks, evaluation pipelines, and analysis tools that show how individual inference features perform, how accurately each supported model runs, and how both change as Furiosa-LLM (FLM) and our software stack evolve.
Your work will give engineering teams reliable evidence for optimization priorities, model support, and release decisions. Working with the MLSys, Inference Engine, Compiler, and LLM Serving teams, you will establish reproducible baselines, investigate regressions, and make performance–accuracy trade-offs clear across models, workloads, and configurations.
Key Responsibilities
• Design and maintain benchmarks that isolate the impact of inference features such as continuous batching, prefix caching, speculative decoding, and distributed inference. Measure feature interactions and end-to-end behavior across representative input/output lengths, concurrency levels, and deployment configurations. • Measure time to first token (TTFT), inter-token and end-to-end latency distributions, throughput, memory use, and accelerator utilization. Compare configurations under explicit workload and latency constraints, and quantify improvements against controlled baselines. • Own model-level accuracy evaluation for supported LLMs, selecting representative datasets and task-appropriate metrics. Compare NPU results with trusted reference implementations and prior releases, and characterize the effects of quantization, numerical precision, and inference optimizations on model quality. • Build reliable automation for benchmarks and accuracy evaluations, including scheduled runs and change-triggered checks. Version models, datasets, prompts, scoring logic, and execution configurations so results remain reproducible and comparable over time. • Maintain dashboards and reports that track performance and accuracy by model, inference feature, hardware configuration, and software version. Define regression thresholds and release acceptance criteria with engineering owners, and integrate evaluation checks into CI and release workflows with the Build & Release team. • Investigate regressions using profiling, controlled experiments, and targeted reproductions. Distinguish implementation changes from workload variation, evaluation errors, and infrastructure noise; work with component owners to identify causes and verify fixes. • Improve measurement quality through repeated runs, statistical analysis, and validation of datasets and scoring methods. Maintain a focused regression suite and broader periodic evaluations that balance coverage, execution cost, and feedback speed. • Communicate findings, supported operating ranges, and performance–accuracy trade-offs through clear technical reports. Use the evidence to recommend optimization priorities and keep benchmark methodology and model evaluation results documented.